Homepage

Enders Analysis provides a subscription research service covering the media, entertainment, mobile and fixed telecommunications industries in Europe, with a special focus on new technologies and media.

Our research is independent and evidence-based, covering all sides of the market: consumers, leading companies, industry trends, forecasts and public policy & regulation. A complete list of our research can be found here.

 

Rigorous Fearless Independent

G.Network and Gigaclear have emerged from debt distress to (seemingly) carry on as before, with sales processes having failed, and a reset that may end with a not-dissimilar outcome.

The altnet consolidation game appears to be in stalemate as VMO2/nexfibre seeks approval for its Netomnia acquisition, but this will result in continued cash burn, with which investors may lose patience.

Altnet pricing is broadly staying low, as they balance the need to maintain subscriber momentum and conserve cash, resulting in continuing pricing pressure on the ISP incumbents.

Abi Watson, head of publishing at media research firm Enders, argues that the FT’s move into personality-led YouTube franchises is less a bid for raw reach than a signal of a structural shift in audience development. 

The FT is unusually well insulated compared with most publishers: its corporate subscription base effectively acts as its own funnel, stressed Watson. Large professional services and accountancy firms buy institutional access, which then familiarizes young professionals with the brand long before they might pay for an individual subscription. “So when the FT decides it needs personality-led YouTube franchises, that’s not a publisher in distress reaching for reach,” said Watson. “It’s a publisher with an unusually defensible position accepting that discovery is now a creator economy problem, and that parasocial attachment to named journalists is doing work that SEO and brand alone no longer do,” she said. 

According to Enders Analysis, publishers are facing headwinds thanks to “structural assymetry” in how consumers interact with them vis-à-vis platforms.

As Enders Analysis notes, this leads to a situation in which “publishers are producing journalism, but platforms are capturing the majority of time spent with it.”

Meanwhile, as Enders writes, credit and compensation for original content “are coming further adrift”, with newsrooms that break stories “capturing less and less of the commercial reward it generates”.

As the report’s authors (head of publishing Abi Watson, senior research analyst Claire Holubowskyj, and media analyst Laura Darcey) explain, in the days of print news, scoops provided news organisations with hours, if not days, of competitive advantage, both in attaining audience and driving revenue based on that audience.

“However, today, exclusives rarely act as moats,” they note.

As Enders Analysis recently argued, habit has become the north star for publishers. Light users haven’t vanished — they’ve simply stopped arriving at the front door, with “what happened” increasingly answered upstream by platforms and AI summaries. The homepage now primarily services the already-converted; breadth alone does not create defensibility. Durable value, the analysts wrote, depends on occupying a recurring need state through vertical products, distinctive voice and community, and reinforcing it through authority and belonging. The Mail’s strategy is essentially a live response to that diagnosis.

“Netflix didn’t invent streaming, but they managed to perfect it a lot faster than anyone else,” Tom Harrington, head of television at Enders Analysis, said. “Netflix were, and still are, several years ahead of everybody in terms of the user interface, which basically means that they set the perception of streaming.”

The streaming giant has been seeking to grow revenue from new programming formats such as video podcasts, live sporting events and video games. “For a decade, it was quite easy for Netflix, they could have a pretty simplistic offering,” Harrington said. “Now, they’re fighting amongst everyone else for incremental growth.”

The market was less convinced by the growth story, particularly given Hastings’ departure, and shares fell nearly 10 per cent after the results. The problem for analysts is that Netflix is in uncharted territory. “There are no clear parallels on which to base potential penetration,” Harrington said. 

Q1 saw Netflix continue to display revenue growth, up 16% YoY (to $12.3 billion), with UCAN (+14%), EMEA (+17%), LATAM (+19%) and APAC (+20%) all contributing strongly.

Netflix has thrived in a decade where TV content has been increasingly siloed. With TV appearing to be moving towards more liquid viewing environments, increased direct competition will disadvantage primary TV destinations.

HBO Max’s launch has so far proceeded as expected, although its decision to not commission locally raised eyebrows: this is in contrast to Netflix, whose UK originals continue to garner the most viewing globally.

UK mobile coverage/quality significantly lags that of its European peers; this really matters, for both consumers and the wider economy, and for both existing services and a range of potential new ones.

Improving coverage will likely require a variety of techniques, from antennas in space to antennas inside shopping centres, and fully utilising the entire range of available spectrum, from sub-1GHz to mmWave.

Network quality competition sparked by the VodafoneThree merger and network rebuild could drive improvements from all three operators, but significant government help is required to ensure this.