Homepage

Enders Analysis provides a subscription research service covering the media, entertainment, mobile and fixed telecommunications industries in Europe, with a special focus on new technologies and media.

Our research is independent and evidence-based, covering all sides of the market: consumers, leading companies, industry trends, forecasts and public policy & regulation. A complete list of our research can be found here.

 

Rigorous Fearless Independent

"Given the structure of the streaming model it is almost impossible to robustly attribute profitability to any single piece of content," says Tom Harrington of media researchers Enders Analysis. He explains that the only ways to do this would be to prove that the specific production led to "a massive volume of incremental sign-ups" or if there is a clear link between viewing and other revenue streams.

Harrington adds that the inability to prove whether a film or a show is financially successful for Amazon may not actually matter as the exclusive streaming content is simply a "a hook to get viewers there in the first place."

“The overlapping networks between buyer and seller will prompt the CMA to look carefully at the deal to ensure that there will not be anti-competitive effects that will lead to higher consumer pricing,” said Karen Egan, head of telecoms at Enders Analysis. 

“However, the companies will argue that the increase in wholesale competition over a wider geographic area will mitigate these concerns.” 

 

Karen Egan, head of telecoms at the analyst firm Enders, said networks have long been trying to conserve spiralling energy costs, even before the war.

Each 5G mast gobbles about as much power as 73 households, according to experts, with some even calling them ‘energy vampires’.

The entire mobile network consumes 370,000 homes’ worth of power a year, or a little under one terawatt-hour of electricity.

‘Of course they are mindful to ensure that there is no customer disruption from this,’ Egan told Metro. ‘If there are energy shortages, then they could possibly push these capacity-limiting efforts a bit harder, getting closer to the levels where some customer disruption is possible.’

G.Network and Gigaclear have emerged from debt distress to (seemingly) carry on as before, with sales processes having failed, and a reset that may end with a not-dissimilar outcome.

The altnet consolidation game appears to be in stalemate as VMO2/nexfibre seeks approval for its Netomnia acquisition, but this will result in continued cash burn, with which investors may lose patience.

Altnet pricing is broadly staying low, as they balance the need to maintain subscriber momentum and conserve cash, resulting in continuing pricing pressure on the ISP incumbents.

Abi Watson, head of publishing at media research firm Enders, argues that the FT’s move into personality-led YouTube franchises is less a bid for raw reach than a signal of a structural shift in audience development. 

The FT is unusually well insulated compared with most publishers: its corporate subscription base effectively acts as its own funnel, stressed Watson. Large professional services and accountancy firms buy institutional access, which then familiarizes young professionals with the brand long before they might pay for an individual subscription. “So when the FT decides it needs personality-led YouTube franchises, that’s not a publisher in distress reaching for reach,” said Watson. “It’s a publisher with an unusually defensible position accepting that discovery is now a creator economy problem, and that parasocial attachment to named journalists is doing work that SEO and brand alone no longer do,” she said. 

According to Enders Analysis, publishers are facing headwinds thanks to “structural assymetry” in how consumers interact with them vis-à-vis platforms.

As Enders Analysis notes, this leads to a situation in which “publishers are producing journalism, but platforms are capturing the majority of time spent with it.”

Meanwhile, as Enders writes, credit and compensation for original content “are coming further adrift”, with newsrooms that break stories “capturing less and less of the commercial reward it generates”.

As the report’s authors (head of publishing Abi Watson, senior research analyst Claire Holubowskyj, and media analyst Laura Darcey) explain, in the days of print news, scoops provided news organisations with hours, if not days, of competitive advantage, both in attaining audience and driving revenue based on that audience.

“However, today, exclusives rarely act as moats,” they note.